Nurse Lucia de Berk Not Guilty, Says Prosecution
March 17, 2010 · by xalieri · Posted in Everything Else
Comments
2 Responses to “Nurse Lucia de Berk Not Guilty, Says Prosecution”
Leave a Reply
Categories
Archives
- January 2018
- January 2016
- June 2015
- May 2014
- January 2014
- October 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- October 2006
- September 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Yes, good news indeed.
I was in court today and it was oh so fine to see the A.G. squirm and try to place the blame for Lucia’s persecution on anyone but his own office.
They had nowhere to run, no case to present.
They couldn’t resist insisting though that she was nevertheless still guilty of retaining a two library books past their return date. This will give them leverage when it comes to the compensation question, she was convicted of a whole package of “crimes”, only the three murders & seven attempted murders have been disproved and dismissed today, she remains “guilty as charged” for the library books, a tube of disinfectant gel she’d taken home in her nurse’s uniform pocket and exaggerating her High-School grades to get into nurse’s school.
Six and a half years in jail should be enough to cover those evil deeds, one would hope, but it may affect her chances of compensation, or at least the level of that compensation.
Who am I?
I’m a guy who saw an obvious wrong being done and couldn’t stand by and watch it happen.
Thanks for flagging this up.
Two late library books, a tube of disinfectant “borrowed” from work, and exaggeration on the ol’ resume. That sounds like what everyone else on earth might be guilty of were inspectors to suddenly come calling with warrants. If that’s what it takes to deny compensation for the harshest kind of defamation of character I can imagine and six years in prison, then the Dutch still have a ways to go before they get this justice thing down.